f o l l o w           

Wednesday, December 20, 2023

Using a combined measurement of media and fan scoring percentages, MMAdecisions.com has compiled a list of 2023's most disputed decisions:



2023's Most Disputed Decisions
Agreement with Winner
# Fight Media Fans Avg. Winner's Judges Other Judge Notes
1Edwards def. Pudilova0%11%6%Huyette, SwanbergGueary-
2Marcos def. Grant14%2%8%Werner, WojciechowskiOhlsson-
3Jenkins def. Emmers0%16%8%D'Amato, LeeWincapawWincapaw 27-30
4Brener def. Tukhugov0%17%9%Field, ClearyFoleyField 30-27
5Albazi def. Kara-France10%10%10%D'Amato, LeeBell5 rounds
6Alencar def. Amanda10%11%10%Byrd, McCarthyD'Amato-
7Mullarkey def. Makdessi14%10%12%Christie, Colon, Lethaby-Unanimous
8Bohm def. Kim9%16%13%Bell, KamijoHarris-
9Demopoulos def. Murata7%18%13%Colon, D'Amato, Lee-Unanimous
10Murphy def. Santos11%17%14%Paolillo, WernerCollett-

Honourable Mentions:

Of note:

  • Ji Yeon Kim was involved in the 5th most disputed decision in 2022 and now the 8th most disputed decision in 2023. Each time she was on the losing side of the result. Kim was also on the winning side of the 10th most disputed decision in 2018.
  • Jamie Mullarkey was involved in the 12th most disputed decision in 2022 and now the 7th most disputed decision in 2023. Each time he was on the winning side of the result. Mullarkey was also on the losing side of the 7th most disputed decision in 2020.
  • Vanessa Demopoulos was involved in the 11th most disputed decision in 2022 and now the 9th most disputed decision in 2023. Each time she was on the winning side of the result.
  • John Makdessi was involved in the 12th most disputed decision in 2015 and now the 7th most disputed decision in 2023. Each time he was on the losing side of the result.
  • All judges involved in the most disputed decision only worked in that one UFC event during the year.

Selection Criteria

  • Only decisions in which at least two-thirds of the tracked media scores disagreed with the actual winner AND decisions in which at least two-thirds of the submitted fan scorecards disagreed with the actual winner were included.
  • A fight must have a minimum of 6 media scores.
  • A fight must have a minimum of 15 fan scorecards.
  • Only fights from Bellator, Cage Warriors, KSW, PFL and the UFC were considered. Though typically, only UFC fights have enough media and fan scorecards to meet the minimum requirements to qualify for the list.

Sources of Bias

There are several possible sources of bias that could have affected the members and order of this list. Those sources include:

  • Loser Bias: Fans who disagree with the outcome are more likely to submit a scorecard than those who are content with the decision.
  • Geographical Bias (Fans): Sometimes certain countries generate more traffic than others, which could lead to a bias in fan voting.
  • Geographical Bias (Media): The media scorecards tracked on this site are predominantly submitted by US-based media members.
  • Small Sample Size: with thresholds set at 6 media members and 15 fan scorecards, it is quite possible that those small thresholds could yield results that vary significantly from the general MMA populace.
  • UFC Bias: Because of the dearth of media and fan scores in other organizations, very few non-UFC decisions meet the thresholds for consideration.

SHOW ALL RECENT BLOG ENTRIES



RECENT BLOG ENTRIES
The Busiest UFC Judges of 2023
The 10 Most Disputed Decisions of 2022
The Busiest UFC Judges of 2022
The Busiest UFC Judges of 2021
The 10 Most Disputed Decisions of 2021
The Busiest UFC Judges of 2020
The 10 Most Disputed Decisions of 2020
The Busiest UFC Judges of 2019
The 10 Most Disputed Decisions of 2019
Examining the Causes of UFC Draws (Updated)
The Busiest UFC Judges of 2018
The 10 Most Disputed Decisions of 2018




© 2020 MMADecisions.com